Aimee Bender’s “Off” makes a strong case for unusual
narrators—though the protagonist possesses incredible malice, her thoughts are
disordered enough and her flashes of humanity frequent enough that the reader
isn’t completely disgusted. Everything
she does is contradictory—she seems to be genuinely fond of Adam, as she says “I
remember just what’s it’s like and I am suddenly feeling like I miss him and I
am remembering everything of what it’s like to be with him.” However, she
abandons him so she can complete her kissing trifecta, and when someone walks
in on her kissing him, she is relieved they do not know her only because it
would interfere with her acquisition of a black-haired man.
The
narrator is not particularly reliable, mainly because she claims knowledge of
things she has no way of knowing. She assumes that Adam feels the same as her
in the bathroom, for example, and thinks that everyone believes her when she
says she only stole the coats because she was drunk. Of course, if she is
drunk, she certainly would not admit it, regardless of the number of coffee
mugs of “affordable-yet-delicious wine” she consumes. Also, she feels superior to everyone in the
party, but by her own description, she is looking a little strange, since she
is wearing a silver dress and drinking wine out of a coffee mug while everyone
around her is wearing T-Shirts and jeans.
There are only a few lines of dialogue in the entire story,
which is interesting. Dialogue would normally allow the reader to make their
own judgments about the other characters, particularly in a present tense story
like this, where the reader knows the story is not being recounted. However,
the small amount of dialogue constrains the reader to view the world almost
entirely from the narrator’s eyes.
Re: the lack of dialogue -- it also emphasizes the narrator's isolation.
ReplyDelete